What is the Contributory Ecosystem Model?

The Contributory Ecosystem Model is Rosie's foundational business philosophy that creates a sustainable, fair, and transparent economic system where all participants—content contributors, IP creators, and ecosystem builders—are fairly compensated based on the measurable value of their contributions.

Unlike traditional platform models where the platform captures most of the value, or pure open-source models where contributors receive no direct compensation, the Contributory Ecosystem Model ensures that value flows to those who create it, while maintaining the collaborative benefits of shared knowledge.

Core Principles

1. Contribution-Based Value Attribution

Every contribution has measurable value. The model tracks and attributes value based on how content and knowledge actually help others:

• Knowledge Contributions: When a contributor's content helps answer a question through Rosie AI Assistant, that contribution generates measurable value
• Intellectual Property: IP creators provide specialized knowledge that becomes part of the ecosystem's knowledge base
• Governance Frameworks: Governance documents and operational processes become reusable, licensable assets
• Ecosystem Building: Members who extend, adapt, or implement frameworks create derivative value

2. Proportional Rewards (Return on Contributions - RoC)

Compensation is proportional to impact. When multiple sources contribute to a solution, rewards are distributed proportionally based on each source's relevance and utility:

• Multi-Source Attribution: When Rosie uses multiple knowledge sources to answer a question, the system tracks which sources were most relevant
• Dynamic Valuation: Contribution value is determined by actual usage and impact, not upfront estimation
• Fair Distribution: Revenue is split proportionally among all contributors whose knowledge contributed to the solution
• Transparent Calculation: All attribution and distribution calculations are visible to participants

3. Self-Sustaining Economy

The ecosystem funds itself through participant activity. Contributors earn credits and revenue that reduce their own costs and create passive and recurring income:

• Time-Credits: Contributors earn credits when their knowledge helps answer questions
• Cost Reduction: Earned credits offset future usage costs, making the system more accessible
• IPR Revenue: IP creators earn licensing revenue when their content is used
• Passive Recurring Income Streams: As the ecosystem grows, early contributors benefit from ongoing usage of their contributions without additional active work
• Reduced External Dependency: Self-funding reduces reliance on venture capital or traditional financing

4. Transparency and Trust

All economics are transparent and verifiable. Participants can see exactly how value is created, attributed, and distributed:

• Clear Cost Calculation: AI service costs, platform fees, and IPR licensing fees are clearly itemized
• Attribution Tracking: Contributors can see when and how their content is used
• Revenue Visibility: Earning and distribution calculations are transparent and auditable
• Builds Ecosystem Trust: Transparency creates accountability and fosters participant confidence

5. Creator Control and IP Rights

IP creators maintain complete control. Unlike platforms that claim rights to user content, Rosie respects creator ownership:

• Creators Own Their IP: Contributors retain all rights to their intellectual property
• Set Your Own AI Assistant Hourly Rate: IP creators define their own hourly rate for when Rosie uses their content (mirroring familiar consulting billing)
• Usage-Based Revenue: Earn prorated revenue each time your content is used—calculated transparently based on response time and content proportion
• Revenue from Expertise: Specialized knowledge generates passive recurring income as others query Rosie
• Derivative Work Rights: Creators can define terms for derivative works and extensions

How It Works in Practice

Participants can take on multiple roles in the ecosystem, with each role building on the previous one's capabilities:

graph TD
subgraph AllMembers["All Members

Consume content
Access licensed content they own"]
subgraph Contributors["Contributors

+ Submit generic content
+ Earn time-credits
+ Build reputation"]
subgraph IPROwners["IPR Owners

+ Create IPR-protected content
+ Set AI Assistant hourly rate
+ Earn passive recurring revenue"]
end
end
end

    style AllMembers fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50,stroke-width:3px
    style Contributors fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#4caf50,stroke-width:3px
    style IPROwners fill:#a5d6a7,stroke:#2196f3,stroke-width:3px

Roles are cumulative: All Contributors are Members, all IPR Owners are Contributors. A single participant typically progresses through these roles over time.

For Content Contributors

1. Contribute Knowledge: Submit documentation, guides, frameworks, or expertise
2. Knowledge Gets Used: When Rosie uses your content to help answer questions, the system tracks the usage
3. Earn Credits: Receive time-credits based on your content's relevance and impact
4. Reduce Costs: Use earned credits to offset your own Rosie AI Assistant usage costs
5. Build Reputation: Appear on leaderboards showcasing valuable contributors

For IP Creators

1. Submit Proprietary Content: Provide specialized, proprietary knowledge or frameworks
2. Set Your AI Assistant Hourly Rate: Define your own hourly rate for when Rosie uses your IPR content (just like you set your consulting hourly rate)
3. Earn IPR Revenue: Receive prorated revenue based on your hourly rate when your content is used—if a response takes 30 seconds and uses 100% of your content, you earn 0.5 minutes × your hourly rate
4. Derivative Revenue: Earn from derivative works based on your terms
5. Maintain Control: Update, revoke, or modify licensing terms and rates as needed

For Ecosystem Builders

1. Leverage Existing Frameworks: Access governance frameworks and operational processes
2. Adapt and Extend: Customize frameworks for your community or organization
3. Create Derivative Value: Build new offerings based on existing IP (per licensing terms)
4. Contribute Improvements: Share enhancements back to benefit the ecosystem
5. Earn from Extensions: License your derivative works to others

For Cooperatives and Organizations

1. Participate as an Entity: The organization itself can be a contributor
2. Receive Revenue Share: Earn percentage of Rosie AI Assistant hourly rates from member usage
3. IPR Licensing Revenue: Receive share of licensing fees for member-contributed IP
4. Sustainable Operations: Revenue share supports operations without investor funding
5. Transparent Distribution: Track exactly how organizational revenue is generated

Why This Model Matters

Alignment with Cooperative Principles

The Contributory Ecosystem Model naturally aligns with cooperative economics:

• Patronage-Based: Economic benefits are allocated based on participation (patronage), not capital contribution
• Democratic: All contributors have equal standing regardless of investment size
• Member-Centric: Value flows to members who create it, not external investors
• Sustainable: Self-funding reduces dependency on external capital

Differentiation from Traditional Models

Long-Term Sustainability

• Incentivizes Quality: Contributors are rewarded for creating valuable, helpful content
• Attracts Expertise: Subject matter experts can monetize their knowledge fairly
• Reduces Churn: Contributors benefit from ongoing passive recurring income, not just one-time payment
• Scales Naturally: As ecosystem grows, early contributors benefit from network effects
• Self-Funding: Less dependent on external funding or grants

Revenue Streams in the Model

1. Rosie AI Assistant Usage Fees (Users Pay)

When users query Rosie AI Assistant, they pay an hourly rate:

• User Payment: Hourly rate for AI Assistant services
• Revenue Distribution:
  • Platform operations (infrastructure, AI provider costs, maintenance)
  • Host organization (cooperative, association, etc.) receives revenue share percentage
• Note: Generic content contributors do not receive direct revenue from usage fees—they earn time-credits that offset their own usage costs (see #3 below)

2. IPR Usage Revenue

IPR Owners earn revenue through the same hourly rate model that users pay:

• IPR Owners Set Their Hourly Rate: Just like setting a consulting rate, IPR Owners define their AI Assistant hourly rate
• Usage-Based Calculation: When Rosie uses IPR content in a response:
  • Response time is measured (e.g., 30 seconds)
  • Content proportion is calculated (e.g., 100% IPR content)
  • Revenue = (time in minutes) × (content proportion) × (IPR Owner's hourly rate)
  • Example: 30 seconds × 100% IPR × $180/hour = 0.5 min × $180/hour = $1.50
• Transparent Attribution: IPR Owners see exactly when and how their content generates revenue
• Revenue flows to:
  • Original IP creators (per their hourly rate)
  • Derivative work creators (if applicable, per their terms)
  • Host organization (revenue share percentage)

3. Time-Credits Economy

• Contributors earn credits from helping others
• Credits offset their own usage costs
• Creates internal economic circulation
• Reduces cash requirements for active contributors
• Contributors can gift time-credits to other members or use them to incentivize new members to join

Implementation Considerations

Technical Requirements

• Attribution Tracking System: Track which content sources contribute to each AI response
• Proportional Distribution Engine: Calculate and distribute rewards based on contribution impact
• Licensing Management: Handle different IP licensing terms and rates
• Credit Accounting: Track time-credits earned and spent by participants
• Transparent Reporting: Provide dashboards for contributors to see their impact and earnings

Governance Requirements

• Contribution Guidelines: Define what constitutes a valuable contribution
• Licensing Standards: Establish acceptable licensing terms and rates
• Dispute Resolution: Process for handling attribution or revenue distribution disputes
• Rate Setting: How licensing rates and revenue share percentages are determined
• Quality Standards: Ensuring contributed content meets ecosystem standards

Legal Considerations

• IP Assignment: Clear ownership documentation for all contributed content
• Licensing Agreements: Enforceable terms for IP usage and derivative works
• Revenue Distribution: Legal framework for distributing earnings to contributors
• Tax Implications: Understanding tax treatment of credits, revenue shares, and licensing fees
• Cooperative Structure: Alignment with cooperative legal requirements

Trademark and Branding

The term "Contributory Ecosystem Model" may be eligible for trademark protection as distinctive branding for Rosie's business approach. This would:

• Differentiate Rosie in the market
• Protect the brand identity
• Signal commitment to this approach
• Enable licensing of the model itself to other platforms

Conclusion

The Contributory Ecosystem Model represents a fundamental shift in how knowledge-sharing platforms create and distribute value. By ensuring fair compensation, maintaining transparency, and respecting IP rights, it creates a sustainable economic system that benefits all participants—from individual contributors to large cooperatives.

This model is not just a feature of Rosie; it's the foundational philosophy that makes Rosie possible as a fair, sustainable, and trustworthy platform for collaborative knowledge work.

---

Learn More: First Person Project 1-Pager | First Person Project Explainer | FPP Specialization for Service Providers | FPP Specialization for Ecosystems & Communities